It was
interesting to notice the difference between the two special guests we had this
past week, David Folkenflik and James Kotecki. Both are polar opposites when it
comes to digital journalism. Folkenflik had to adjust to new digital technology
during his career. He established himself as a journalist with his career at
NPR and his groundbreaking stories. Kotecki made a name for himself through his
online vlog. He grew up using this digital technology to his advantage and has
turned his vlogging into a career. Folkenflik is more of the traditional form
of journalism and news reporting, very straightforward that focuses on
important corporate, international, and economic affairs. Kotecki is able to
use more of his personality within his vlog, even making fun of the subjects
he’s talking about. He is able to use satire in his work to attract a different
kind of audience; a youthful fan following that is internet-savvy. These men
take different approaches in their reporting, but coming from my generation, I
think that Kotecki’s style of reporting is not only more interesting but will
also soon replace other forms of journalism and breaking news. It’s not as
simple now to just report the facts. Journalists and reporters have now merged
together. There is no hiding behind the printed page anymore because these news
reporters need to put in extra effort to keep their audience engaged and
interested in the information, whether they agree with it or not. Along with
this engagement, there is a relationship that is formed between the reporter
and the audience, each side is now able to give their own opinion, which creates a more
dynamic form of journalism.
Thanks for making the implicit comparisons by putting these two case studies on the syllabus explicit, although you will want to use links and paragraph structure to improve the readability of your posting.
ReplyDelete