When I was
growing up, there was always one thing that my teachers kept telling their
students, “Don’t use Wikipedia as a source for your paper!” Considering the
fact that I had no idea what Wikipedia was and did not understand why my
teachers were so adamant about not allowing us to use it, I was very confused. Later,
I discovered, that most, if not all, people know now, Wikipedia can be edited
by individuals who have no authority in the subject matter or any professional background
of posting information on the website. I understand now why my teachers were so
concerned. The fact remains that you cannot believe everything that you see and
read on the Internet. Not all information is true, especially on Wikipedia.
When searching for specific subjects, I have come across multiple Wikipedia
entries for the same search, one with tons of information and the other with
just the basic introduction. And not all the facts that were stated were
accurate. It is interesting to see the restrictions that Wikipedia has put on certain
entries so they do not become vandalized. The fact that vandalism has taken the
next step into cyber-space is somewhat terrifying. Once it’s on the Internet, sure
it can be monitored and corrected, but it will never truly go away. With
Wikipedia, we are giving citizens too much power; the power of knowledge, truth,
lies, and deceit. Wikipedia is a dangerous tool that people can take advantage
of and manipulate under their own will. Yes, there are people monitoring the
pages but they cannot take care of all the factual discrepancies that exist
throughout the entire Wikipedia realm of information. I think that Wikipedia
should be left to the professionals and not the citizens. Only then will it be
perceived as an appropriate source of information rather than one to be
avoided.
Although personal experiences and individual viewpoints of a writer may be more important in blogging than other journalistic genres, it is important to 1) foreground information, 2) consider the timeliness of a specific story, and 3) make strong connections to our digital journalism class. For example, what can you say about the Wikitorials experiment at the LA Times based on your own access to specific sources that may also illustrate how vandalism creates problems.
ReplyDelete